Posts

Gov. Newsom should invest in clean transportation. It will make California healthier

by Bill Magavern, CalMatters


Highlights:

  • Governor Gavin Newsom should cut diesel pollution as fast as possible
  • Even though California is leading the nation in the advancement of clean transportation technologies, cars account for the largest greenhouse gas emissions
  • Solutions to the California emissions problem include: deployment of more EVs, more pedestrian and bike paths in cities, and other clean mobility measures

Transitioning from internal combustion engine cars to electric vehicles is a key component of The Climate Center’s sustainable mobility work.


Read more: https://calmatters.org/commentary/electric-vehicles-2/

Re-thinking personal travel plans: a no fly zone

On December 20, 2018, my wife and I watched an interview of fifteen year-old Greta Thunberg and her TED talk about the climate crisis. In the moments afterward, we realized that we could no longer justify flying.

The power of this young person’s voice is overwhelming. If you have not listened yet to Greta’s TED talk or her speech at the 2018 Climate Summit in Poland, we suggest you do. Greta’s way of communicating offers one of the most, if not the most, clear, compelling, and inspiring messages to all of us, especially we of the older generations, that we of the developed nations must start making sacrifices now to have any hope of enabling Greta’s generation to have a livable planet.

Grappling with how to respond to the climate crisis is an ongoing evolution, and we have taken some steps over the years, but it is rare that we make new big commitments. Committing to no more flying is a big one for us. But there was something special and super-compelling about Greta’s intensity, integrity, clarity, and consistency, and it affected us, and we are newly inspired to act.

One of the compelling things Greta says is that “what we do now, me and my generation can’t undo in the future.” She is right. Once airborne, although some carbon dioxide is continually absorbed in varying ways in the carbon cycle, much of it stays in the atmosphere for many decades to centuries. She says that “you are stealing our futures in front of our eyes” by continuing to emit carbon. The best option has always been and remains, not emitting carbon in the first place.

Greta also affirms that equity and climate justice are absolutely necessary to make action on climate work at the global scale, meaning that the developed countries must get down to zero emissions first so that poorer countries can build the infrastructure – roads (for EVs and bikes of course), schools, hospitals – that we already have. She says “today we use 100 million barrels of oil per day and there are no rules today to keep that oil in the ground, so we can’t save the world by playing by the rules and the rules have to change. Everything needs to change, and it has to start today.”

Regarding flying specifically, Greta puts it in black & white terms. If you fly, you are part of the problem, or you do the right thing and don’t fly. And she has convinced her once globe-trotting parents to swear off flying.

The commitment matters more if it is shared with others. Greta tweeted a recent study that found that leading by example by quitting flying has a huge impact. The bottom line? According to the study, 75% of people say if someone they know stays on the ground because of climate concerns it changes their view. Ergo, this blog.

Would a movement to reduce air travel matter? Ultimately I concluded that yes, it matters. When enough people make a similar commitment, to the point where a market force is applied, the global volume of air travel will be reduced. Reducing air traffic, which is currently expanding, would help significantly.

Knowing that I have a work trip to Denver in June 2019 from where I live in northern California, I quickly got onto Amtrak’s website to see what the possibilities are for train travel. We did have some experience with this since we took a cross-country trip by train in 2007 for a climate march in Washington DC. Train travel is not inexpensive, it takes a long time, and it is not carbon-free, but it is better than flying, and with enough planning, it appears to be workable. Given the fact that one can do some work on a train, taking the extra time for travel may not be a big problem. I recognize that that won’t necessarily work for everyone. We all have our own circumstances and limitations, so the point is, it can work if you put some careful planning into it.

But here is another point for all who care: All forms of powered travel have some emission, so the important question to ask if one really wants to reduce their footprint is: do I really need to take this trip?

Then there are emergencies. If faced with a life and death emergency, we would consider flying. But that is the only exception to our new self-imposed rule.

Here are some things to think about that can help reduce your travel emissions.

  • Consider not traveling. Every time you think about traveling by air, think: “Do I really need to?”
  • Consider all the alternatives, if you must travel. A 2008 Union of Concerned Scientists “Getting There Greener” guide offers some ideas.
  • Cancel the frequent flier program. Get rid of the things that would incentivize you to fly. Cancel any credit cards that give flier miles as rewards; switch to other forms of rewards.
  • Offset your carbon.

I’ll end with a couple of quotes from Greta. Greta says that we already possess what we need to solve the climate crisis, “we have all the facts, and we have the solutions, all we have to do is wake up and change.” She says “instead of looking for hope, look for action. Then, and only then, hope will come.” OK Greta, heard you, we are acting!

Student commute programs cut emissions significantly

amy-and-lu

Santa Rosa High School student on her way to school.

World wide transportation accounts for only 13 percent of our carbon footprint 1.  However, in the Bay Area transportation is biggest GHG contributor, 2 and here in semi-rural Sonoma County, transportation accounts for more than half of our greenhouse gas emissions 3.  We drive a lot.

So what can we do about it? The Sonoma County Transit Authority listed Safe Routes To School programs like our Eco2school program as a key component to reaching our emission reduction goals. Student commute programs like The Climate Center’s ECO2school Program educate and encourage students to try new healthier behaviors while also reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

In Sonoma County there are 21,569 high school students. According to data collected by the ECO2school program, 13,373 of them live in walk or bike distance (3 miles) from school. Yet only about 3,000 of them or 18 percent use active transportation such as walking and biking. If the other 10,000 students who live in proximity to school walked or biked just one day a week the carbon savings would be significant. In addition, they would be building a healthy habit that can last a lifetime. Once students start biking they realize it is fun and bike commutes don’t take as long as you think.

“I love zipping by all the cars stuck in the parking lot when I hop on my bike to ride home from school.” Says Trae Petruska, Windsor High School Senior. “Even better I ride on a creek path.  I see water, and trees on my ride instead of traffic.”

whs-eco2school-table

Students at Windsor High School.

It is not just students however, who need to start changing behavior. Increased physical activity associated with walking and biking generates improvement in community health. Increasing walking and bicycling from 4 to 22 minutes daily reduces GHG emissions and the risk of cardiovascular disease and diabetes by 14 percent. This could save Californians an estimated $34 billion in health care and deferred road maintenance costs 3. Most of us are not willing or able to give up our cars completely. But about 60 percent of the trips we take are within a 3-mile radius of our home. Imagine if the half a million people living in our community made a commitment to walking or biking for short trips. There would be less traffic congestion, less road rage, cleaner air, fitter and happier constituents.  And of course the carbon savings would be immense.

So, challenge yourself to start walking and cycling. Support your children (or your parents) to do the same. Like bringing bags to the store, recycling cans, composting yard waste, and refilling water bottles, cycling is a habit we can learn.

  1. https://www3.epa.gov/climatechange/test/climatechange/ghgemissions/global.html
  2. http://www.baaqmd.gov/~/media/files/board-of-directors/2015/agenda_14_preliminary-climate-protection-program-update-pdf.pdf
  3. http://scta.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Draft-CTP-7-1-16_web.pdf