Keep tabs on climate and energy legislation in California and urge your representatives to take action for a climate-safe future.

Supported by The Climate Center

AB 1939: Pupil instruction – climate change

Status: Failed in Committee

AB 1939 (L. Rivas et al) This bill would require that science classes for grades 7-12 to include coursework on the causes and effects of climate change and methods to mitigate and adapt to climate change no later than the 2023–24 school year. Read author’s factsheet. Read The Climate Center’s Letter of Support. STATUS: Approved in the Assembly. Held in the … Read more

AB 1956: Woody biomass – collection and conversion

Status: Failed in Committee

AB 1956 (Mathis) This bill would create a 5-year woody biomass rural county collection and disposal pilot program, to be administered by the CalRecycle Greenhouse Gas Reduction Revolving Loan Program.  STATUS: Introduced February 10. Assigned to the Assembly Natural Resources Committee. Held in committee May 19. Dead.

AB 1966: Fossil fuel-dependent workers – California Equitable Just Transition Fund

Status: Failed in Committee

AB 1966 (Muratsuchi) Would state the intent of the Legislature to subsequently amend previous legislation that created the Clean Transportation Program to include provisions that would establish the California Equitable Just Transition Fund to assist fossil fuel-dependent workers with wage replacement, wage insurance, pension guarantees, health care, retraining, peer counseling, and relocation support for fossil fuel workers who … Read more

AB 2114: California Pocket Forest Initiative

Status: Failed in Committee

AB 2114 (Kalra) Establishes the California Pocket Forest Initiative at the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. STATUS: HELD August 11 in the Sen. Appropriations Committee (FAILED).

AB 2237: Transportation planning – regional transportation improvement plan

Status: Failed in Committee

AB 2237 (Friedman) This bill would have brought transportation funding at the local level into alignment with the need to reduce the emissions that cause air pollution and climate change. If enacted as written, it would have meant more money for transit, bicycle and pedestrian-friendly infrastructure, and no more dollars for road expansions that increase vehicle … Read more

Supported by The Climate Center

AB 2419: Federal Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act – Justice40 Advisory Committee

Status: Failed in Committee

AB 2419 (Bryan) AB 2419 would have invested 40 percent of federal climate and infrastructure funding to low-income, Indigenous, and rural communities and communities of color. Read the news release and the author’s factsheet. STATUS: HELD August 11 in the Sen. Appropriations Committee (FAILED).

AB 2593: Coastal development permits – blue carbon demonstration projects

Status: Failed in Committee

AB 2593 (Boerner-Horvath) Requires the California Coastal Commission to require an applicant with a public project that impacts coastal wetland, intertidal, or marine habitats or ecosystems seeking a coastal development permit to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions by building or contributing to a blue carbon project, and requires new development to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. STATUS: HELD August 11 in … Read more

AB 2696: Transmission facilities – study

Status: Failed in Committee

AB 2696 (E. Garcia) Relates to ownership and control of electricity transmission infrastructure, and matters relating to achieving state greenhouse gas emission goals. STATUS: HELD in the Appropriations Committee August 11 (FAILED).

AB 2731: Schoolbuses – zero-emission vehicles

Status: Failed in Committee

AB 2731 (Ting) Would require that 100% of all newly purchased, contracted, or operated school buses of a school district, county office of education, or charter school to be zero-emission vehicles by January 1, 2035. STATUS: HELD in the Appropriations Committee August 11 (FAILED).

AB 2816: State Air Resources Board – zero-emission incentive programs

Status: Failed in Committee

AB 2816 (Ting) Focuses electric vehicle incentives on displacing gasoline; prioritizes transitioning lower income drivers using the most gasoline to EVs, and has the effect of reducing the total number of EVs required on the road to achieve a 50% reduction in California’s light duty vehicle emissions. Read the coalition Letter of Support. STATUS: HELD August 11 in … Read more