CARB Chair: 100% Zero Emission Vehicle sales target in 2030 could be reality

By John Boesel, CALSTART


California Air Resources Board (CARB) Chairman Mary Nichols emphasizes the importance of banning internal combustions engine (ICE) vehicles during the CALSTART California 2030 Policy Summit.

  • Nichols was previously opposed to the ban of ICE vehicles due to the potential backlash but stated at the Summit:

“I’ve become convinced of the need to send a longer-term signal of where we’re heading…If we can make it clear that it is the will of the legislature and [CARB], then there should be a clear end to [internal combustion engine] sales.”

  • California historically sets ambitious climate goals and targets and an ICE ban would be a major step for the state’s emissions reductions
  • If carmakers keep to their promise to produce more EVs, by 2023 there will be many more long-range electric and fuel cell vehicles available for sale 
  • Policy firm Energy Innovations issued a report suggesting California would need to establish an 80% Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) sales target by 2030 to meet its 2030 greenhouse gas reduction target
  • California produces more electric vehicles and has more electric vehicle-related jobs than the rest of the country

The Climate Center’s Climate-Safe California campaign calls for investments and bold policies to support clean mobility, including a phase-out of all gas-powered vehicles.

Read more:

Jet Blue goes eco-friendly

JetBlue to become first airline to become carbon neutral

by Mary Schlangenstein, Bloomberg

JetBlue Airways Corp. said it will become the first large U.S. airline to offset emissions from all of its domestic flights, aiming to become carbon neutral by July as pressure grows on the industry from climate change activists.

The carrier also will begin using sustainable aviation fuel on its flights from San Francisco International Airport, the New York-based airline said Monday.

Read more:

The tortured tale of two transportation bills

Or how I learned to love the fight for climate change

by Jane Bender, Board member of The Climate Center

Here’s the bottom line

An overwhelmingly Democratic legislature in the most progressive state in the union cannot pass a study bill on reducing vehicle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions because of one person—the Chair of the Assembly Transportation Committee.

And here’s the whole story.

We were thrilled two years ago when Assemblymember Phil Ting (D-San Francisco) introduced AB 1745, a bill stipulating that starting in 2040, any new passenger vehicle had to be zero emissions to be registered in California.

This was truly a “speed and scale” solution responding to the thorny issue of GHG-smothering transportation in this state. The Climate Center was behind the bill from the first. But alas, the fossil fuel industry got wind of it. The industry unleashed their lobbyists and Ting was forced to withdraw the bill. It didn’t have a chance even to get out of the Assembly Transportation Committee.

Ting didn’t give up however. Working with a coalition of environmental and clean air activists, he introduced AB 40, a bill, that took a two-step process. For the first step, the bill called for the California Air Resources Board (CARB) to come up with a feasibility study of how such a ban could work for our state. First a study.

The second step would have been a bill to implement CARB’s proposals. Plenty of time for analysis, for public hearings, for debate.

Again, we at the Center jumped on AB 40. Ting worked with Assemblymember Jim Frazier (D-Solano County) and chair of the Transportation Committee. Frazier was the key to getting AB 40 out of committee onto the floor for a vote. Frazier strongly opposed AB 40, as he had AB 1745 the year before.

The opposition was just as vocal and effective this time around. The business community wrote a long letter opposing all aspects of the bill.  Ting tried to work with Frazier on compromises. But in the end, Ting gave up. Frazier’s demands weakened AB 40 so significantly that it became unworkable. Frazier wouldn’t budge and Rendon, the Speaker of the Assembly, remained hands off.

So there you have it. The challenge facing us has risen to new heights. We are fighting for the future and against the forces of denial. And yes, I feel inspired by the challenge.

This is the most important thing we can be doing for our grandchildren, and for the millions of people who, like the typhoon victims in Africa, the flood victims in the Mid-West, the fire survivors in California, are now and will continue to face massive dislocations and chaos.

This blockade in our state legislature is a clarion call to action for all of us.  And I hope you love the call as much as I do. We need a lot of passion as we go forth.

Stay tuned for ways you can be involved. And in the meantime, take the clean car pledge.


B.C. introduces law to require cars, trucks sold by 2040 be zero emission

by The Canadian Press

All light-duty cars and trucks sold in British Columbia would have to be zero-emission by 2040 under legislation tabled Wednesday.

Energy Minister Michelle Mungall says the Zero Emission Vehicles Act aims to fight climate change by phasing out gas-powered vehicles.

She says the legislation would set target dates of 10 per cent zero-emission sales by 2025, 30 per cent by 2030, and 100 per cent by 2040.

The legislation would apply to new vehicles for sale or lease.

Mungall says zero-emission vehicles are part of the government’s $902 million CleanBC program to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 40 per cent by 2030 based on 2007 pollution levels.

Read more: