April 8, 2015 by Barry Vesser
You might have heard about about the massive spill at a Duke Energy facility into the Dan River in North Carolina last year. A storm water pipe ruptured allowing coal ash contained in ponds to
flow into the river. Duke estimated
that between 30,000 and 39,000 tons of ash, along with 27 million gallons of
contaminated water, had been released into the Dan River. Coal ash, the toxic remains of
coal burning in power plants, is full of chemicals that cause cancer, developmental
disorders and reproductive problems.
Virginia, which is downstream of where
the spill occurred in North Carolina, recently assessed a $2.5 million fee on
Duke to help pay for improvements to the environment in areas affected by the
Dan River spill. For the full story.
This brings Duke Energy’s fees
associated with the spill to over $150 million, which includes a $100 million
settlement with the United States government and $25.1 million from the North
Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources for groundwater
Those are the costs to the company, but
this is just one cost that the coal industry inflicts on the environment and
our health. Add it to carbon pollution, the damage caused by mountain top
removal and other mining, and the impacts on worker health and safety.
When you consider that the solar
industry now employs 173,807 people nationwide compared to about 93,185 in the coal industry, you wonder
how we can continue to put up with the multiple negative impacts of coal to our
environment. The solar sector has a long way to go yet, but it is currently
growing about 20 times faster than the overall U.S. economy, so it may not take
as long as some people think.
Barry Vesser is the Deputy Director of The Climate Center
- Expansion of fossil-fuel vehicle phase-outs moves world one step closer to a climate-safe future - April 22, 2020
- Germany goes greener with $95 billion push for train over plane - January 14, 2020
- EU sets out trillion euro plan to avert ‘climate crash’ - January 13, 2020