Report: California Must and Can Accelerate Commitments to Global Climate Leadership
By Daniel Kammen, Teenie Matlock, Manuel Pastor, David Pellow, Veerabhadran Ramanathan, Tom Steyer, Leah Stokes, and Feliz Ventura
Click here for the full report, which is buoying Climate-Safe California‘s urgent call on state leaders to take decisive action on climate change. This report is also covered in the Los Angeles Times here.
Climate change is occurring at a faster, more destructive rate than previously known which demands California take much more aggressive action.
- Over the next ten years, California’s big climate challenges – hotter summers, a shorter rain season, and more destructive wildfires – will grow in intensity by nearly 50%.
- We will reach a dangerous level of climate change (an average temperature increase of 2.7℉) as early as 2027 – nearly two decades earlier than initially projected.
- Nine of 15 global climate tipping points are already approaching or beyond natural limits, which risks committing the world to long-term and irreversible damage.
Doing nothing or pursuing timid climate solutions will cost California trillions of dollars in destructive impacts to our economy, public health, equity, and way of life. Our health, food production, and economy are at serious risk. Low-income communities, many communities of color, and the elderly are disproportionately impacted today and this trend will increase in a future with more extreme temperatures, the onset of a severe multi-decade drought, dust bowl conditions, more destructive wildfires, and exposure to toxic air quality.
Bold policy changes now are critical to the pursuit of effective, equitable solutions. The authors urge California to:
- Reach net-negative carbon emissions by 2030 instead of 2045
- Cut greenhouse gas emissions by 80% – instead of 40% – below 1990 levels by 2030
- Target super pollutants – methane, black carbon soot, and hydrofluorocarbons
- Invest in nature-based carbon sequestration at scale
- Adopt policies that align with the latest climate science, ensure a just transition for workers and communities dependent on fossil fuel industries, and prioritize climate-friendly investments in low-income communities and communities of color.
Aggressive targets are tough but achievable.
- Solutions already exist that can bend California’s warming curve in ten years and eliminate 75% of the state’s air pollution. Examples include: phasing out gas-powered vehicles, feebates/credits on clean and energy efficient technology, incentives rewarding clean energy and jobs in disadvantaged communities, Community Choice clean energy, adding the cost of carbon to decision models, soot-free diesel, banning food waste from landfills, and using farm animal food additives.
- Clean energy investments build social equity. They create nearly twice as many jobs as the fossil fuel industry while improving air quality, especially for low-income communities of color near the state’s biggest polluters. Seven million Californians live within a mile of oil/gas wells.
- California has been a global climate leader but our current approach is obsolete. Rhode Island committed to 100% renewable energy by 2030. Los Angeles has a framework for the same goal by 2035. President Biden aims for the US to have clean energy by 2035. The United Kingdom will reduce GHGs 86% below 1990 levels and ban gas-powered vehicles by 2030. Finland committed to net-zero emissions by 2035.
- As a center for international research, technology and partnerships, California is positioned to profit by resuming its historic role in climate leadership and propelling the world into adopting more clean technology. Wind and solar power are the most affordable form of new energy in most of the US. Solar power is the cheapest. California helped make possible these clean energy gains and it has the infrastructure to continue this role.