by Rachel Becker, CalMatters
California has relied on its carbon cap and trade program to dramatically reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in the state. Many believe this policy is not strong enough to reduce emissions to 40% below 1990 levels and now the state must decide if it will reform the program.
- California was the first in the United States to implement a cap and trade program and it is now one of the largest pollution markets in the world
- In the past two years, the auctions of pollution permits gather $600 million per auction and the money is used for programs like EV rebates
- Due to the unstable economy from the coronavirus pandemic, auction revenue is declining
- Major polluters that purchase permits include oil refineries, power plants, transportation, and manufacturers
- Polluters are not in favor of adjusting the cap and trade program, saying that it could increase the price of gas and consumer goods
- Currently, the state is not on track to reach 2030 emissions targets and must reassess how to meet these goals
Using climate funding mechanisms, such as a carbon fee and dividend, we can effectively produce an additional $20 billion per year specifically for a climate-safe California while reinvesting back into our communities.
- Emissions Gap Report 2020: Where we are & where we should be to avoid catastrophe - December 16, 2020
- California’s 2018 wildfires cost the US economy $148.5 billion - December 16, 2020
- California 550 MW virtual power plant would be the biggest yet - December 16, 2020