00:23:16 Holly Kaufman: Hi Melissas! (Holly Kaufman) 00:23:21 Nadia Soraya Kock: Good morning🙂 00:23:25 Christopher Jennings: Hello my fellow colleagues and fellow American's I'm glad that we could connect 00:23:48 Donna Lee: Good morning! Donna from Pasadena 00:23:53 Pamela Martinez: https://theclimatecenter.org/carbon-dioxide-removal-webinar-series/ 00:26:18 Phil Kithil: Greetings from The Sea Upwelling Company Inc www.sea-up.life. If you would like a case study for your community, please reach out to phil@sea-up.life. Thankks! 00:26:34 The Climate Center: Hi Donna! 00:27:29 Donna Lee: Hi Marc! 00:28:18 Pamela Martinez, The Climate Center: Thank you for joining today’s webinar! Please drop all your questions into the Q&A, not the Chat. 00:30:43 The Climate Center: https://theclimatecenter.org/about/people/alayna-chuney/ 00:39:22 Amit Bharti: Land burden is another concern 00:41:22 Melissa Romero: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/gassing-satartia-mississippi-co2-pipeline_n_60ddea9fe4b0ddef8b0ddc8f 00:41:27 Melissa Romero: https://www.npr.org/2023/05/21/1172679786/carbon-capture-carbon-dioxide-pipeline 00:41:34 Melissa Romero: https://pstrust.org/denbury-pipeline-company-responsible-for-2020-carbon-dioxide-pipeline-rupture-in-satartia-ms-leaks-co2-again-this-time-in-sulphur-la/ 00:42:47 Kathhy Dervin: Co2 displaces oxygen which is why engines stopped working 00:43:29 The Climate Center: https://theclimatecenter.org/about/people/ileana-navarro/ 00:44:12 Matt Holmes: Doing Great Ileana 00:44:19 Peter Mackin: Correct re ICE vehicles. If your vehicle is an EV, your car will not stop working. 00:45:04 Matt Holmes: The eVehicle no suffocation lane. 00:45:50 Gary Hughes: https://news.oilandgaswatch.org/post/data-shows-denburys-carbon-pipelines-leak-more-than-any-other-co2-pipeline-companys 00:48:16 Lori Pesante: They just announced want to transport CO2 a very long distance along CA's I-5 between a cement plant in the mountains to these CCS sites: https://bakersfield.pressreader.com/article/281496461802881 00:50:58 Jim Wilson: land burden 00:51:07 Jim Wilson: land burden https://phys.org/news/2024-11-scientific-lots-reality-lot-messy.html?utm_source=nwletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=daily-nwletter 00:51:16 Judith Borcz: Are the communities having any success in pushing back on these plans? 00:51:36 Lori Pesante: Send your public comment about the CRC Carbon Frontier CCS permit application to planning@kerncounty.com 00:51:50 Matt Holmes: The federal allotment for CA's orphan wells should be all anyone needs to interrogate their confidence on any storage in that basin. 00:52:20 Stacey Meinzen: Please drop questions in the Q&A, thank you! 00:52:30 Jennifer Simpson: Thanks Ileana! Great information 00:52:33 Kathhy Dervin: At this moment SB 905 prohibits CO2 pipelines in Ca, with an exception for “on site” pipelines which are proposed for Terra Vault 1 project running on their property. 00:53:16 Kathhy Dervin: Thank you Ileana! 00:53:25 Lori Pesante: Strong community pushback at CTV I Kern County Planning Commission meeting led to CRC postponing their second CCS project from Planning Commission consideration. BUT, it will be heard in 2025. 00:53:27 The Climate Center: https://theclimatecenter.org/about/people/amanda-mckay/ 01:01:16 Melissa Romero: article Amanda is talking about: https://www.huffpost.com/entry/gassing-satartia-mississippi-co2-pipeline_n_60ddea9fe4b0ddef8b0ddc8f 01:02:44 The Climate Center: Please type into the Q&A section any questions you may have for our presenters. 01:03:04 George Peridas: The CO2 in the Satartia rupture had significant hydrogen sulphide (H2S) content, because it is naturally occurring in the formation where Danbury mined the CO2 from (Jackson Dome). H2S is a really hazardous substance. The green haze, burning sensation and smell of rotten eggs that the local reports mention are because of this. 01:05:45 Gary Hughes: How ironic that CO2 is still being extracted from natural occurring geological deposits while the narrative of putting it back under ground is central to ‘carbon management’ discourse. 01:07:49 The Climate Center: https://theclimatecenter.org/about/people/jens-birkholzer/ 01:16:09 Alan Shinkman: Will these slides be sent to us after the presentations? Thanks. 01:16:32 Pamela Martinez, The Climate Center: Yes, the recording and slides will be shared. Thanks! 01:17:14 Lori Pesante: project proponents should be required to live next to their projects. 01:18:59 Avery Colter: Yes, we have heard of seismicity with regard to HF. 01:21:45 Kathhy Dervin: Problems with Norway’s carbon sequestration projects https://www.desmog.com/2024/10/28/norways-equinor-admits-it-over-reported-amount-of-carbon-captured-at-flagship-project-for-years/#:~:text=Norwegian%20oil%20and%20gas%20company,climate%20solution%2C%20DeSmog%20can%20reveal. 01:22:44 Avery Colter: Three things every monitoring scheme needs: REDUNDANCIES, REDUNDANCIES, AND REDUNDANCIES!!! 01:23:23 Lori Pesante: Project proponents have a long history leaks/ spills AND of not allowing air monitoring even when NDAs are offered. They cannot achieve these safety standards 01:24:18 Melissa Granados: Yes please share!! 01:24:19 Pamela Martinez, The Climate Center: Please type into the Q&A section any questions you may have for our presenters. 01:24:29 Matt Holmes: 👆Avery* 01:24:31 Matt Holmes: 👆Avery* 01:24:31 Matt Holmes: 👆Avery* 01:27:26 Kathhy Dervin: Thanks to all the speakers. 01:28:30 Matt Holmes: The combination is corrosive 01:29:18 Gary Hughes: Considering all the risks with CDR/DAC/CCS/CCUS et al is it ironic or Orwellian that the California Natural Resources Agency puts SB 905 implementation (and CO2 pipeline work) under a ‘transitioning to clean energy’ umbrella? https://resources.ca.gov/Initiatives/Transitioning-to-Clean-Energy 01:33:35 Avery Colter: How does all this transport of supercritical CO2 and deep injection compare in expense and hazard to just transporting materials to sites of high CO2 emission which can form solid carbonates by reaction, then transporting and sequestering these solid carbonates? 01:38:16 Lori Pesante: DOE Community Benefits Plan requirements have formalized greenwashing, pseudophilanthropy and tokenization. 01:38:45 Diane Doucette: Our next webinar will go into more detail on community benefit plans, oversight, governance. 01:38:57 Matt Holmes: 👆Avery's Comment: At least then we'd have some assurance that mineralization has occurred. 01:39:29 Asha Sharma: 50 years does not seem like very long term corporate liability if we’re assuming carbon needs to be sequestered “forever” to justify implementation. What would the long-term cost be to taxpayers be for maintaining and monitoring carbon injection sites after this period is over or if a corporation goes under? 01:39:45 Gary Hughes: Wow Community Benefits Agreements are so controversial, I am stunned that this being presented as a viable option. It is like we are going back in time…have we not learned anything after all these years? 01:41:43 Diane Doucette: One of our upcoming webinars will look at Monitoring, Reporting and Verification as well as responsible accounting. 01:42:27 Jim Wilson: Thank you Gary Hughes for keeping it real. 01:43:43 Avery Colter: Let's put it all in Yucca Valley, next to all the perfectly-sealed nuclear waste LOL! 01:44:28 michael mora: How likely will the Trump admin. candidate for head of EPA put the interests of CO2 emitters ahead of local monitoring and siting authorities? 01:44:38 Kathhy Dervin: FACT: We see a lot of smaller ( and large) oil companies go out of business or transfer their assets and walk away from their well clean-up obligations. This is a well known problem across the US. What’s to stop entities doing Carbon sequestration from grabbing their 45Q tax give aways and walking away from their long term obligations? Esp with major deregulation coming to Washington. 01:45:12 Judith Borcz: So true Kathy Dervin! 01:46:03 Matt Holmes: Kathy 👆 01:46:26 Christina Scaringe: Agree Kathy. 01:46:33 Peter Mackin: You could require LOCs or bonds to cover future clean up costs. Then even if the project sponsor walks away these costs would be covered. 01:47:35 Beverly DesChaux: the answer is ALLtopics! 01:47:44 Peter Mackin: agreed 01:48:03 Christina Scaringe: Not a great history in CA of bond requirements coming anywhere close to actual costs in oil well remediation. 01:48:05 Ellie Cohen: Great job Melissa and all presenters. Thanks so much to Enviro Voters, Project 2023 and The Climate Center! 01:48:15 ana rico: Thank you everyone, for today's information. 01:48:19 Matt Bright: Thank you! Very informative. 01:48:22 Gabriel Rosenstein: Thank you very very interesting! 01:48:22 Stacie Banks: Thank-you all! 01:48:27 Al Sattler: The presentation by Dr. Birkholzer featured a traffic light decision process. Who would be making the decision about whether to go from Green to Red? The operator obviously has an economic incentive to not shut it down. If the project owners/managers had to live in the area, would there be an addiitonal incentive to make sure that it is run safely? 01:48:27 Alan Shinkman: Well done everyone! 01:48:28 Kathhy Dervin: Gracias! 01:48:28 Christina Scaringe: Thanks Melissa 01:48:28 gerri clemens: great 01:48:43 Al Sattler: The hazard to communities is terrible. In addition…I saw that the Tule Elk Preserve is partially within the footprint of one of the projects. Could wildlife supporters be recruited to increase opposition? 01:48:43 Matt Holmes: Thanks CCEJN! 01:48:44 Ellie Porciuncula: thank you! 01:48:46 Beverly DesChaux: so hreat 01:48:46 Windy Twelves: Thank you