by Ann E. Marimow, Washington Post
A clash between judges on two federal courts in Washington has created an early, unusual test of new rules intended to make sure courthouses across the country are civil, harassment-free workplaces.
And it has exposed the perils of the reply-all email, even among judges for life.
A U.S. District Court judge forwarded an email to about 45 judges and their staffs to flag an upcoming climate-change seminar co-sponsored by the research and education agency of the judiciary branch. His note said, “just FYI.”
Within an hour a judicial colleague responded sharply to the group, questioning the first judge’s ethics and urging him to get “back into the business of judging, which are what you are being paid to do.” He also said, “The jurisdiction assigned to you does not include saving the planet.”
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/legal-issues/a-federal-judge-in-dc-hit-reply-all-and-now-theres-a-formal-question-about-his-decorum/2019/08/15/551155b4-ba17-11e9-b3b4-2bb69e8c4e39_story.html
Latest posts by Guest Blogger (see all)
- Big automakers take risks in siding with Trump administration against California - November 6, 2019
- California may be a climate leader, but it could be a century behind on carbon goals: study - November 6, 2019
- With 10% penetration, EVs could shift all residential peak load to night, analysis of SoCal Ed finds - November 6, 2019